Getty PhotosAn Indian magnificence service start-up has discovered itself within the eye of the storm for a publicity marketing campaign geared toward highlighting office stress.
A couple of days in the past, an inner electronic mail from Sure Madam went viral on social media, through which workers had been knowledgeable that the corporate had determined to “half methods” with those that had reported feeling harassed at work.
However on Tuesday, the start-up clarified that it hadn’t fired anybody and that the social media posts had been a part of a “deliberate effort to focus on the intense challenge of office stress”.
The marketing campaign has sparked combined reactions on-line, with some praising it for drawing consideration to an vital subject and others criticising the corporate for deceptive individuals and “toying” with their feelings.
Some customers additionally identified that the marketing campaign had succeeded in propelling an nearly unheard of name into the limelight in a matter of hours.
“Free promotion completed proper, huh? Who wants a advertising funds when you’ve got outrage as your social media supervisor?” one person posted on LinkedIn.
This is not the primary time {that a} start-up has courted controversy for indulging in a questionable publicity marketing campaign.
Final month, the founding father of an Indian meals supply platform acquired bouquets and brickbats after he posted a job opening for the place of “chief of employees” however mentioned that the candidate wouldn’t be paid for a yr and would as an alternative need to donate two million rupees to the corporate’s non-profit enterprise that goals to offer meals to the poor.
He later claimed that greater than 10,000 individuals had utilized for the job however did not point out if anybody had truly been employed for the put up.
In February, a celeb confronted large backlash on-line after she feigned her dying to attract consideration to cervical most cancers. Many customers mentioned that the publicity stunt was deeply traumatising to those that had truly misplaced family and friends to the sickness.
The advertising company liable for the marketing campaign later apologised, however these controversies have not stopped manufacturers from pushing the bounds of promoting to weird ranges.
Model specialists say that whereas such advertising gimmicks would possibly assist a model shoot into the limelight, it doesn’t essentially enhance the longevity or success of the corporate.
Quite the opposite, it’d do it extra hurt than good.
Manufacturers want to grasp the distinction between exaggeration and telling a blatant lie, says Karthik Srinivasan, a branding and communications marketing consultant.
“Exaggeration is an accepted and profitable promoting technique, the place a model makes use of artistic licence to push the bounds of the reality to make a degree,” he says. “However the exaggeration is so apparent or conspicuous {that a} client is not doubtless or anticipated to imagine it,” he provides.
He offers the instance of the Axe deodorant adverts, which might usually present a scrawny-looking man reworking right into a magnet for girls as quickly as he sprays himself with the deodorant.
Then there was rapper Snoop Dogg, who made headlines final yr for announcing that he would be “giving up smoke”, solely to disclose that he was truly speaking about utilizing a smokeless hearth pit of a selected model.
Getty PhotosIn each situations, the exaggerations are so excessive that they’re nearly comically unrealistic.
“However telling a blatant lie has no place in moral promoting,” Mr Srinivasan says.
Manufacturers have interaction in such excessive campaigns as a result of they’ll garner large publicity whereas utilizing little to no funds. The concept is to choose matters which can be prone to evoke sturdy opinions, thereby making certain that individuals have interaction with the marketing campaign, whether or not they prefer it or not, Mr Srinivasan says.
Within the case of the viral marketing campaign by the sweetness start-up, the corporate’s electronic mail touched a chord with many professionals, who then shared it on their LinkedIn or X (previously Twitter) profiles, criticising the corporate for its insensitivity and lack of care in the direction of its workers.
“Firing somebody for being harassed at work is a critical challenge and was positively going to evoke sturdy reactions,” Mr Srinivasan explains.
However such campaigns can injury a model or an organization’s fame within the eyes of its workers and customers, he provides. “Credibility and belief take time to construct and a model will discover it laborious to shake off the detrimental publicity that comes with an insensitive advert marketing campaign.”
Mayank Sehgal, a advertising marketing consultant, echoes an identical view.
“It is essential for manufacturers to prioritise moral advertising practices and keep away from utilizing individuals’s feelings as a software for self-promotion,” he says.
“Whereas attention-grabbing techniques may match within the brief time period, they in the end erode belief and injury model fame.”
Observe BBC Information India on Instagram, YouTube, Twitter and Facebook.
