ORLANDO, Fla. — There have been quite a few ironies surrounding the results of the contemporary baseball era committee’s Hall of Fame ballot, introduced Sunday night time at MLB’s winter conferences.
Maybe probably the most poignant is that this: If not for Barry Bonds, Jeff Kent — the one one of many eight gamers into account chosen Sunday — won’t be certain for Cooperstown. Whereas Kent is the all-time residence run hitter amongst second basemen, he was on the identical poll as Bonds — who hit extra homers than anybody, at any place.
Throughout a post-announcement information convention, Kent recalled the way in which he and Bonds used to push, prod and generally annoy one another throughout their six seasons as teammates on the San Francisco Giants. These have been Kent’s finest seasons, a reasonably late-career peak that ran from 1997 to 2002, throughout which Kent posted 31.6 of his 55.4 profession bWAR.
The crescendo was 2000, when Kent loved his profession season at age 32, hitting .334 with a 1.021 OPS, hammering 33 homers with 125 RBIs and compiling a career-best 7.2 bWAR. Hitting fourth behind Bonds and his .440 OBP, Kent hit .382 with runners on base and .449 with a runner on first base.
Throughout Kent’s six years in San Francisco, he was considered one of 5 gamers in baseball to go to the plate with a minimum of one runner on base a minimum of 2,000 occasions, and the opposite 4 all performed a minimum of 48 extra video games than he did. Seems, hitting behind Bonds is a fairly good profession transfer.
To be clear, Kent was an impressive participant and the numbers he compiled have been his, and his alone. Whenever you see how the information of election impacts gamers, it is a particular factor. I’m completely happy Jeff Kent is now a Corridor of Famer.
However I’m much less pleased with the Corridor of Fame itself. Whereas Kent’s overwhelming help — he was named on 14 of the 16 ballots, two greater than the minimal wanted for induction — caught me greater than a bit of off guard, what did not shock me was the general voting outcomes. In what amounted to superb print, there was this point out within the Corridor’s official information launch: “Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens, Gary Sheffield and Fernando Valenzuela every obtained lower than 5 votes.”
By the brand new tips the Corridor enacted for its ever-evolving period committee course of — tips that went into impact with this poll — Bonds, Clemens, Sheffield and Valenzuela aren’t eligible in 2028, the following time the modern period is taken into account. They are often nominated in 2031, and if they’re, that is most likely it. If they do not get onto a minimum of 5 ballots then, they’re carried out. And there’s no purpose to imagine they’ll get extra help the following time.
I believed that the make-up of this committee was stacked in opposition to the PED-associated gamers, however that is a subjective evaluation. And who is aware of what goes on in these deliberations. With so many gamers from the Nineteen Seventies and Nineteen Eighties within the group, it appeared to bode nicely for Don Mattingly and Dale Murphy. However they have been each listed on simply six ballots. Carlos Delgado had the second most help, at 9.
Why? Beats me. I’ve given up making an attempt to interpret the veterans committee/period committee processes which have existed through the years. However the newest tips appear completely designed to make sure that for the following six years, there is not any purpose to wail about Bonds and Clemens being excluded. Then in 2031, that is it.
In the meantime, the traditional period will likely be up for consideration once more in 2027, when Pete Rose can and certain will likely be nominated. Maybe Shoeless Joe Jackson as nicely. What occurs then is anyone’s guess, however by the second week of December 2031, we may very well be taking a look at a Corridor of Fame roster that features the lengthy ineligible (however no extra) Rose and perhaps Jackson however completely excludes the never-ineligible Bonds and Clemens — maybe the most effective hitter and pitcher, respectively, who ever performed.
If and when it occurs, one other form of symbolic banishment will happen: The Corridor could have consigned itself, with these revised tips, to at all times being lower than it must be. And the appreciable shadows of Bonds and Clemens will proceed to loom, bigger and bigger over time, simply as they occurred with Rose and Jackson.
Ironic, is not it?

















































