Hilsa is Bangladesh’s nationwide fish. Domestically often known as ilish, it’s cherished because the queen amongst fish and types a part of the culinary id of each Bangladesh and the bordering Indian state of West Bengal.
Former Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina used the fish – which is discovered within the Bay of Bengal and in rivers – as a device of diplomacy to foster ties with its western neighbour, India.
However Bangladesh’s interim authorities’s determination to briefly ban exports of the fish to India in September prompted a culinary disaster of kinds forward of the competition of Durga Puja in India. Hilsa fish cooked in mustard sauce is a well-liked delicacy through the competition. Some specialists considered the transfer as a diplomatic rebuke for New Delhi’s backing of Hasina, who has taken shelter in India after her removing in late August.
Dhaka insisted the ban aimed to scale back the price of the freshwater fish domestically amid a leaner harvest this 12 months. It, nonetheless, reversed its order inside two weeks.
So what’s the fish on the centre of all of it, and is it greater than only a well-liked meal?
What’s hilsa, the fish on the centre of the India-Bangladesh diplomatic row?
Bangladesh exports 70 p.c of the world’s hilsa. However the prized catch is more and more turning into uncommon and costly, owing to overfishing, elevated demand and environmental challenges like local weather change.
Fishermen this 12 months say they’re additionally struggling to catch satisfactory quantities of hilsa as a result of tough sea circumstances.
The exports add to the shortage, with the fish unaffordable to most Bangladeshis as a result of its excessive value. In 2024, the worth of a 1.5kg hilsa fish reached about $15 (1,800 Bangladeshi taka) in native markets, in contrast with about $10.9 (1,300 taka) final 12 months.
At 550,000 to 600,000 tonnes a 12 months, hilsa contributes about 12 p.c of Bangladesh’s whole fish manufacturing, supporting roughly 500,000 fishers straight and two million individuals in associated industries.
Some cherished staples of native delicacies embody bhapa ilish (steamed hilsa), ilish polao (pilaf rice with hilsa), and shorshe ilish (hilsa in mustard sauce).
Did Bangladesh impose a ban on hilsa exports to India?
In September, Dhaka imposed an export ban on hilsa, particularly focusing on shipments to India. This got here within the run-up to the Durga Puja competition in October when demand sometimes peaks throughout the border.
Fisheries officers defined that the ban was essential to prioritise home provide and handle the declining hilsa inhabitants.
“We can’t permit ilish to be exported whereas our personal individuals can’t purchase them. This 12 months, I’ve instructed the Ministry of Commerce to stop any ilish exports to India throughout Durga Puja,” Farida Akhter, adviser to the Bangladesh Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock informed the Dhaka Tribune.
Nevertheless, weeks later, the Commerce Ministry reversed the ban and accepted a 3,000-tonne cargo to India.
“In opposition to the backdrop of appeals by the exporters, approval has been given to export 3,000 tonnes of hilsa fish (to India), fulfilling the precise circumstances on the event of the upcoming Durga Puja,” learn the ministry’s assertion.
Hilsa costs have shot up sharply in India as Dhaka diminished exports by 1,000 tonnes. However the authorities has did not carry down the costs in Bangladesh.
“A syndicate of fishermen who smuggled hilsa to India stored the worth excessive,” stated Khandakar Tahmid Rejwan, a analysis information analyst on the Bangladesh Peace Observatory below the Centre for Options.
An professional from India stated the temporary ban marked “a agency departure” from Hasina’s follow of utilizing the fish as an emblem of goodwill and friendship between Dhaka and New Delhi.
Hasina first used the fish as a diplomatic device when she got here to energy in 1996. She gifted hilsa to then-West Bengal Chief Minister Jyoti Basu forward of a landmark settlement on sharing water, a serious bilateral difficulty between the neighbours.
In 2016, the previous Bangladeshi prime minister despatched a consignment of hilsa to Mamata Banerjee, who heads the federal government of West Bengal bordering Bangladesh. A 12 months later, former President Pranab Mukherjee, a outstanding Bengali chief of the time, was gifted hilsa as a gesture of friendship.
However the interim authorities is prone to diverge from Hasina’s pro-India international coverage, in line with an professional on India-Bangladesh relations.
The transfer by the interim authorities “compromises the goodwill” between the 2 nations, Sohini Bose, affiliate fellow on the Observer Analysis Basis in Kolkata, informed Al Jazeera by way of e mail.
Is that this the primary such ban?
No.
Bangladesh imposed a ban on hilsa exports to India in 2012 following disputes over a water-sharing settlement. This was finally lifted in January 2018 as a goodwill gesture.
Moreover, through the years Hasina’s authorities ceaselessly made exceptions to the ban by “gifting” a whole bunch of tonnes of the fish forward of Durga Puja.
Bangladesh additionally periodically imposes native bans on fishing hilsa to guard it throughout breeding intervals.
The primary ban is enforced for 22 days throughout October and has been a follow since 2007. This restriction throughout hilsa’s spawning season provides it time to breed undisturbed.
The draw back is that this poses financial challenges for fishermen, a lot of whom depend on hilsa for his or her livelihood.
Hasina has additionally gifted domestically made sarees and mangoes to leaders throughout the border.
In 2021, Hasina reportedly sent 2,600kg of Haribhanga mangoes to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee.
The gesture got here as Bangladesh confronted a delay within the provide of COVID-19 vaccine doses from India.
Why are ties between India and Bangladesh strained?
India backed Hasina till the tip of her 15-year rule, which rights group say was marked by human rights abuses, electoral manipulations and a crackdown on opposition events.
New Delhi additionally noticed silence on a authorities crackdown that killed greater than 300 protesters, shortly earlier than she fled Bangladesh. India’s internet hosting of Hasina has not gone down nicely with the interim authorities, which has sought Hasina’s extradition – a requirement New Delhi is unlikely to honour.
Many in Bangladesh understand New Delhi’s backing of Hasina as enabling her heavy-handed strategy.
In her 15-year rule, Hasina fostered shut ties with India, significantly by safety cooperation agreements, which critics and opposition events stated have been biased in favour of New Delhi.
Vilification of Bangladeshis by the Hindu nationalist authorities in India as “infiltrators” and “termites” has additionally angered Bangladeshis. Final week, Dhaka condemned “a highly deplorable” speech by Indian Residence Minister Amit Shah.
Addressing a political rally within the japanese state of Jharkhand, Shah said if a BJP authorities was elected within the state, “We’ll cling each Bangladeshi infiltrator the wrong way up to provide them a lesson”.
Dhaka has additionally complained in regards to the killing of its residents on the border by India’s Border Safety Pressure. Rights teams have slammed the “illegal killings and abuse of Bangladeshi individuals on the border”.
Rising Islamophobia and assaults towards Muslims below Modi have additionally instilled anti-India sentiments in Bangladesh.
Furthermore, the Hasina authorities’s commerce offers with Indian firms additionally got here below scrutiny, with critics accusing her of signing offers that benefitted Indian firms.
The Teesta River dispute additionally stays a serious level of rivalry between Bangladesh and India, as each international locations rely closely on its water for agriculture. Bangladesh has lengthy sought a fairer allocation of the river’s circulate, arguing that the present association – managed primarily by India – causes water shortages through the dry season.
Moreover, the sudden launch of water throughout heavy rainfall has contributed to flash floods in Bangladesh, including in August this 12 months.
Officers at Bangladesh’s Flood Forecasting and Warning Centre informed Al Jazeera that not like up to now, India didn’t difficulty a warning to its neighbour in regards to the launch of water final month. India’s Ministry of Exterior Affairs dismissed the experiences, calling them “factually not right”.
India, significantly its West Bengal state, has resisted adjustments to the prevailing river-sharing settlement, citing its personal agricultural wants.
India’s ties to Hasina’s celebration, the Awami League, return to when the celebration was combating for liberation from Pakistan within the Seventies. New Delhi has cultivated shut ties with the secular Awami League and has seen the opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Occasion and Jamaat-e-Islami as comfortable on Pakistan.
What have the 2 international locations stated in regards to the diplomatic tensions?
Interim chief Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus has referred to as for a reset in relations. Earlier this month, he criticised Hasina for giving directives from her haven in India, including that her continued interference in Bangladeshi politics may exacerbate tensions.
He has additionally warned India to maneuver away from its narrative that Islamist forces, supported by teams like Jamaat-e-Islami, are overtaking the nation.
India’s Fish Importers Affiliation earlier this month in a letter urged Dhaka to permit exports of the fish, particularly for the competition.
What’s the long run for India-Bangladesh ties?
Rejwan, the researcher primarily based in Dhaka, says “the resentment that was constructing in frequent individuals is reflecting in a extra formal diplomatic channel”, including that beforehand the connection was solely heat on the highest stage.
He says, nonetheless, that there’s potential for India and Bangladesh’s relationship to be mutually helpful, however that it have to be primarily based on fairness and see progress with key points equivalent to border killings.
“If the federal government fails to deal with these and keep a stability with New Delhi, then will probably be perceived as just like Sheikh Hasina’s regime,” he added.
Bose from the Observer Analysis Basis believes the 2 international locations have the potential to enhance relations because of the present, “pure” interdependence.
“With adjoining territories the world over’s fifth-longest boundary, Bangladesh and India have a number of frequent assets from commerce of day by day necessities to familial connections,” Bose stated.
“This geographic actuality is indeniable regardless of any political transition, which makes it vital for India and Bangladesh to keep up a purposeful relationship.”
